7
Feb

Is Judaism different from Paganism?

   Posted by: Pressed   in Christianity & Theology

Time for an Old Testament theology lesson. Some believe that Judaism is just another pagan religion like all the others. They can match up different things that happened in the Old Testament to things that occurred in the writings of pagan religions and claim that Judaism sprang from or borrowed from many of the pagan religions to formulate their story. I, however, believe that Judaism differed from all other forms of religion and paganism in almost every aspect of its nature. From their gods, temples, and priests to their sacrifices and spiritual behavior pagan religions differed in every way.

The basic idea of Israelite religion is that God is supreme over all. There is nothing around Him our outside of him that has authority or sovereignty over Him. Unlike man and the pagan gods, the God of Judaism is not subject to laws, physical dependences nor time. He is non-mythological in all that He is and does.

God has no ancestry and fathers no generations of other gods. The God of Judaism does not inherit authority nor does He pass it on to other generations. He does not die, He does not have any sexual qualities, and He does not depend upon other powers or things outside of himself. God is completely independent. Unlike most pagan religions who’s gods sound and act like everyday humans with super powers.

The one true God of Judaism has no companions and his opponents are lifeless idols made out of wood, metal, or other created materials. The God of Judaism is jealous and battles with other gods throughout the Old Testament, which are not really gods at all, but figments of humans imagination and need for something to worship.

Another thing that sets Judaism apart is the doctrine of creation. God is the one, and only one who creates everything. There was nothing before he created it, and He created it all out of nothing, ex-nihilio. Creation did not occur by some sexual process, nor did it come from the seed, blood, spit, tears of God. Most of the pagan religions have a common mythological event such as divine births, deaths, wars, banquets, and amusements that mark what creation was all about.

The gods of paganism always derive their power from something outside of themselves. You have gods of water, sky, earth, wind, and so on. However, God does not draw from any source outside of Himself, nor is He dependant upon the things that he himself created. He existed before the earth and everything in it did, and He will exist long after those things fade away. God’s destiny is determined by God alone and not the lives of other pagan gods.

The Israelites God is far above the laws of the universe and fate, which most pagan gods are subject to. There are really no fights between gods, battles for heaven, and God certainly does not use sorcery like some pagan gods were known to do. God does not sin, He does not mess up, and He is not subject to anyone�s will but His own. These things sets Judaism apart from all other religions.

Though some writings and stories may have similarities, there are no other religions nor pagan gods that could ever live up to the one true God. He is far greater than anything man could conceive. His word is more powerful than any other text or material ever written, because it contains life. The bible is packed with the power of God, filled with the love of God, drips with the blood of Christ that cleanses us from all unrighteousness, and leads us to the truth. No other book can claim it… The God of the Israelites, the God who has revealed Himself throughout history, He is the one true God who deserves our worship and praise.

Pressed

This entry was posted on Saturday, February 7th, 2004 at 11:13 am and is filed under Christianity & Theology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

12 comments so far

FireChild
 1 

You are wrong in the statement you made about pegan gods deriving their power from outside sources (earth, air, fire, water) in fact they are the (for lack of a better term) personification of the element. This is a common misconception since most people do not accurately learn what peganism entails. I have been a practicing pegan (which is not a specific religion, but a grouping that is non-christian) for over 10 years. And it (*&^%) me off when people give out inaccurate information.

P.S.
Judaism is a non-pegan religion, since it is a part of christianity (in fact the foundation of christianity).

February 20th, 2005 at 9:21 pm
wyrlwyn
 2 

this makes me very sad that you are all so close minded, that you cant let someone, even a group of similar thinkers have there own faith, that you must desicrate our way of life into what some band of islams have done. our “gods”, if thats how you see it, dont get there “power” from “objects”, they simply are. they are as much as we have faith in them, and they will watch over us, just like we let your “god” watch over you.

August 23rd, 2005 at 9:46 am
ZER0
 3 

sad just sad you would go and write such a debokery it is clear you have a true pation for yer religion and a true hatred for peganism so i ask you then what does yer opinion matter id much rather here from someone who is open minded and free from labeling themself rather than someone who would put such time just to state that there own god is all powerfull while other gods have limitations to there powers well i ask you this if there was a god would there be only one is it beyond yer consemption of vreative thinking to wonder who or what created that god or is he the most boring being ever to exist and for eternity twitled his thumb till the idea came about to create life well enough said i only felt i should write you what you asked for and i hope that one day you realise that it is nothing more than a book and that heaven is with in you and one day you come to peace with yer self and the ones around you and transend to a better state of mind

ps you spelt paganism wrong

May 18th, 2006 at 9:50 pm
 4 

This post was a simple comparison of Paganism and Judaism and how some historians try to lump them together as if Christianity came from Pagan ideas. Less about opinions and more about facts really. I am very open minded. I think anyone can have their own opinion about whatever they want, but I don’t have to think that there opinion is correct. If you want to believe 1 + 1 = 8 then you can believe that all you want, but I have every right to say that 1 + 1 = 2 and that isn’t closed minded at all. Now if I told you that you are a horrible person for believing that 1 + 1 = 8 and you have no right to believe that and if I tried to come oppress you and force you to not believe that anymore, well then that is another story all together. Most people who have a problem with Christianity actually take things to an extreme and it becomes more of an anti-intelletual, childish game to bash Christians and call them closed minded when the very fact that you are saying those things makes you closed minded to Christianity and hypocritical in everything that you say.

I was actually not saying that other god’s have limitations to their powers, I was really saying that other gods do not exist. Can’t really have any limitations if you don’t exist in the first place.

The problem with the multiple gods of some Paganism is that they were created by human imagination which makes these gods out to be so very human. You ask the question “If there was a god would there be only one?” making the assumption that if there was only one god then he sat around bored and twiddling his thumbs. Being bored and sitting around are very human ideas, and yet you attributed them to God, and that is exactly my point in this post. The created gods of Paganism do not compare to the God of Christianity.

P.S. you spelled debauchery, passion, your, paganism, powerful, conception, creative, twiddled, and realize wrong and you forgot punctuation and capital letters. But, thanks for pointing out that I spelled Paganism wrong, I fixed my typo.

May 19th, 2006 at 10:50 am
j
 5 

Pressed,
You claim to be stating facts, but I fail to see any facts stated by you. Stating a fact means that you’re stating something which is provable. I see none of this in your writing. Please correct me if I’m wrong. The ideas that your conveying in your writing refer to the King James and other english translations of the bible which are NOT literal or accurate translations of the original text.
I don’t know if you’ve explored the original Hebrew text of the old testament, but it clearly refers to a plurality of gods creating the sky and the Earth. The word “Elohim” is the plural reference - “El” being the generic word for “god” and “him” meaning “more than one”. For example, one cherub is simply refered to as “cherub”, many “cherub’s” is correctly refered to as “cherubHIM”, and so on. You can do the research yourself using Strong’s Hebrew Lexicon (or you can use any credible translator or lexicon that you like - it’ll show up the same). There are actually many refereces to Elohim in the Old testament. Really, the concept of Duality (One Good God - One Evil Satan) wasn’t introduced until the last millenia BC.
I’m not trying to knock anyone’s religion, or say that one religion is true and others are not, I’m just stating matters of provable evidence. The Hebrew OT text is the oldest text that exists, and it says nothing about one god creating the earth or a heirarchy of angels maybe helping God create the earth. It’s “gods” literally.
If you’re going to accept the bible as truth, then you should accept the very first verse - Gen 1:1 which should probably been translated as “The land and the water were created by gods first”. This was the way that the writer put it (that writer being Moses, if you so choose). That being the case, there’s much more of a similarity between christianity and paganism than you would infer in your prior statements. It leaves little room for your ideas of duality.
Thanks for reading, and good luck in all of your endeavors.

June 1st, 2006 at 5:13 am
j
 6 

BTW - I was a little disappointed by the malicious content filter. If you speak truth, you should be unafraid to post any reply. No god will fall from malicious or stupid commentary - or dirty words.

June 1st, 2006 at 5:19 am
 7 

j: In regards to your last post about the content filter: A reply containing a picture of pornographic nature is however, not something I want to see. I appriciate Pressed’s measures to prevent me seeing such content post in the comments of his blog. It has happened before. Dirty pictures are a little different than dirty words.

June 3rd, 2006 at 10:57 pm
 8 

j. The content filter is to remove spam. If I didn’t us it then I would never be able to keep up with the porn industry spamming my website and creating links to nasty sites by using my web space that I paid for.

As far as Hebrew goes, yes I have looked at the Old Testament in Hebrew. I’ve have a couple years of studying and translating the Hebrew text under my belt and I understand that the word “Elohim” is plural. And in the Old Testament when it is used in a plural sentence then it is used to refer to ‘gods’. However, there is something different about the word Elohim when it refers to the one God of Israel. It is used with singular verbs and adjectives when referring to God (a singular deity).

Thus the very first words of the Bible are breshit bara Elohim, where bara ??? is a verb inflected as third person singular masculine perfect. If Elohim were an ordinary plural word, then the plural verb form bar’u ???? would have been used in this sentence instead. - Wikipedia

The writer intentionally used the plural word Elohim with singular verbs and adjectives while in the same way he uses it with plural verbs and adjectives in other areas. The majority of English translations capitalize G of god when the Hebrew text uses Elohim in a singular sentence structure.

Speaking of the God of Israel using terms of plurality in a singular sentence structure could also be making reference to the Trinity, God being three and yet one. Either way, it is the context of the message itself that leads to the truth of what the Bible says, not simply nit-picking one word to try and make a case against the singular God of Christianity.

June 5th, 2006 at 10:28 am
Ty
 9 

Pressed:One point you made in your arguement was that the G-D of the Israelites is not another pagan deity because He does not have have petty and weak human-like qualities. You say pagan gods are clearly created by man because they have these characteristics and they have a history that includes wars btwn good/evil and bearing children who are gods just like their parents. So I ask, isn’t our G-D, the HOLY ONE of Israel, a jealous G-D? and angry at times? Getting angry at something that is below you and jealous at what it has created (as possible competition for you) seems truly like a person whom we would refer to as an idiot. My beliefs are very similar to yours Pressed and to say the least I am impressed with your site so I am asking for your opinion as to how could our G-D, the single perfect existance our minds can barely grasp, even for a second appear in such a different light?

Any opinions/ideas from any or all are appreciated
Ty.

August 11th, 2009 at 3:25 am
 10 

Ty,

Our God is a jealous God not because He fears possible competition but because He desires and demands obedience from His people. When we do things (or do not do things) which excite His jealousy we envoke His wrath and anger. This is a good thing for it reveals His holy righteousness and power over sin. Who would not want to serve a jealous God? Oprah? I find comfort in a God who desires and demands my ALL. I find comfort in a God who is angered to wrath over sin. I find comfort in a God who provides atonement in the death of His very Son for my sins so that I might even have the possiblility of of not making Him jealous and angry–something I am unable to do of my own accord–for I daily, even with my salvation, offend a righteous and holy God.

K

August 11th, 2009 at 8:34 am
Ty
 11 

K,
You say our G-D desires and demands obediance from us and; you say that in fact He demands our all. Knowing this, you admit you are still not perfect and have daily transgressions, which is pefectly understandable since you are only human. But with that said, my previous statement implies that we will always mess up and it is such a casual occurance that we can expect such a behavior from our fellow neighbors. My point is perhaps the bar was set too high and if this is a known fact why would such behavior anger the All-Knowing G-D, especially since He was going to provide atonement anyways Himself. This resembles a “there is no hero without the villain” scenario. We would not need a Saviour if He was not a jealous G-D who is angered by our slip ups. I wanted to avoid the Saviour in this discussion because my questions concerning Him and His nature are numerous and I just want to clear up my previous question of how can our perfect G-D get angry at us and threaten to severely punish us when He Himself knows we cannot live up to His expectations. His wrath scares us into obedience, it just seems like a characteristic we would see in a bad parent who then later glorifies themselves claiming they are so good because they put food on the table or did something else that they are supposed to do in the first place. We, as His children, cannot be held responsible for not being perfect and so I think His anger cannot be justified, and His anger leading to His wrath is further unjustified. Who would get angry and beat a child who didn’t know any better? not a perfect parent but rather an average human parent who just lost their temper and regretted it later. So once again I’m lost as to how can our G-D, the single perfect existance our minds can barely grasp, get jealous, angry, and even wrathful?

August 12th, 2009 at 1:40 am
 12 

Ty,

You have hit on the quintessential dichotomy of Christianity. Yet you are not the first. The beloved apostle in his first epistle desires us to wrangle with this very aspect of Christianity. If we sin we are not in Christ…If we are in Christ we will not sin…yet we sin…and he writes this why? So that we may have complete joy, so that we may not sin, so that we might have eternal life.

Here is my take. We are commanded to Love God but it impossible to love God. We are commanded to not sin–being in Christ. Yet we sin (at least I do; even in my Bible bubble in Seminary). The end game is that I draw closer to him daily, needing Him daily, praising Him daily. His wrath does not scare me for there is now therefore no condemnation… But my lack of love for Him shames me. Why do I sin? Because I love my sin more than I love Him.

Even the apostles ran in the sight of danger. They physically walked with the Lord. I run at even less. Oh that He would pour divine wrath on my to keep me close to His side should be my prayer.

Lastly, sin have a divine purpose. I trust you do not think that sin is just an irritation that annoys God and one day He will do away with it. He hates sin of course. But He allows it to draw us closer to Him.

The dichotomies are real. Learn to live with them. Learn to embrace them.

The answer to many of your complex questions above is simply YES (with a great big grin) :)

August 12th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment